A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2013. 3. 27. 12:15경 아산시 풍기동 231-1에 있는 아산경찰서 청문감사관실에 술에 취한 채 찾아가, 피고인이 C을 절도로 고소하였던 사건의 담당 경찰관을 찾으며 “야 D형사 어디 있어 ”라고 소리치는 등 소란을 피우던 중 피고인에게 방문 목적을 묻는 위 경찰서 소속 경위 E에게 “너 이 자식 나하고 맞짱 한번 뜰래 나와 보라고 이 새끼야”라는 등으로 소리치며 E의 목에 걸려 있던 신분증을 손으로 잡아당긴 후 집어던지고, 머리로 E의 이마 부분을 들이받은 후 양손으로 E의 가슴 부분을 밀어 넘어뜨리고 E의 손을 잡고 밖으로 끌어내려고 하는 등 폭행하였다.

After that, the Defendant left the police station building to return home again, and again, the Defendant saw the disturbance, such as “Chewing singring, and singing in the direction of the criminal team in front of the police station office,” and sing in the door, and sing off the door, and, as she was removed from the mitigation fund belonging to the above police station, she called “I see by leaving the governance see? I see by leaving the head of F with a hand, and being towed by five meters.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations and civil petitions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement related to E, F, and G;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (where a suspect confirms the contents of dynamic pictures taken for the obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. of the suspect A’s motion pictures taken for the obstruction of performance of official duties, attaching

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders [the decision of the sentence] is that the obstruction of performance of official duties or coercion of official duties [the person who has been specially punished] - aggravated factors: the degree of obstruction of official duties is serious.