logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2021.03.26 2019누65261
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

1. The appeal by the defendant assistant is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant assistant intervenor.

claim. The purport of the claim.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

A. The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) was a school foundation operating D University, etc., and the Plaintiff was in office as S Hospital’s sexual surgery and assistant professor from September 1, 2003, as the same sexual appearance and associate professor from September 1, 2008, and as the same sexual appearance and associate professor from September 1, 2016, respectively.

Han Part E served as the sex and clinical full-time lecturer from March 1, 2008, from March 201, as the same sex and clinical assistant professor from March 1, 201, as the same sex and clinical assistant professor from March 1, 2013, as the same sex and assistant professor from March 1, 2015, as the sex and associate professor from March 1, 2015, and the F served as the sex and clinical instructor from May 1, 2015, and as the sex and clinical assistant professor from March 2, 2017, respectively.

B. On December 18, 2015, the Plaintiff, along with E and F, published a thesis of the title “H” (hereinafter “the instant thesis”) in No. 69 (hereinafter “G”) of “G” (hereinafter “the instant academic journal”), and the said thesis was finalized on March 6, 2016 and published in the instant academic journal and was finally published around that time.

The gist of the instant thesis was to obtain improved treatment effects by performing re-building surgery using the original marth-based mark-based mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar (hereinafter “instant re-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-mar-

In the paper of this case, the plaintiff was registered as the Dor Dor Don Don Don Don Don Do, E, and F as the 1st joint author, and E and F contributed equally to the thesis of this case.

The plaintiff and E proposed research on the author's roles, "in relation to Authorship," and the plaintiff and E prepared the draft of this paper, F collected data and prepared the draft of this paper, and all authors prepared and approved the last thesis.

(c)

D. The Committee on the Truth of Research in D University (hereinafter referred to as the “Committee on the Truth of Research”) shall be August 29, 2016.

arrow