logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.05.22 2013고정136
산업안전보건법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, and by a fine of KRW 6,000,000, respectively.

Defendant

A above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B Co., Ltd. is a corporation that performs the construction work at the 'new construction site of the Daz.', and Defendant A is a field agent at the above site and is in general charge of safety and health who exercises overall control over and manages affairs such as prevention of harm and hazards to workers.

1. Defendant A, on June 21, 2012, at the construction site above,

(a)in the workplace or in the workplace, a safe passage to be used by an employee is installed and maintained at all times at the workplace, but did not take such measures within the working site; and

(b) At the end or opening of the work plate and passage, where workers might fall down, the protective measures such as safety railes, fences, vertical fall-off nets or covers should be built in a strong structure with sufficient strengths, but did not take a crash preventive measures, such as the installation of safety rails at the end of the factory heat cover in the construction site; and

(c) In the case of being installed on a powder ground in order to prevent divers against the navigation gear or navigation gear using power, the divers do not take such measures as the divers used at the above construction site despite the use of divers or divers, etc. in order to prevent the diversing of each unit or unit; and

(d) In the case of excavating the ground, where the excavated ground, etc. is ordinarily a ground, the excavated ground shall meet the standards of 1:0.5 to 1:1, in the case of the ground, or where appropriate measures are taken to prevent the collapse of the lute area, such as soil mosing, but did not take such measures on the ground of factory B heating.

2. Defendant B, at the above date and place, did not comply with safety measures as above by Defendant A, an employee of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement (the second court date);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a report on supervision and inspection of construction business and a corrective order;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow