1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The Defendants jointly do so, (1) 450,630,867 won against the Plaintiff A.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff A is an employee of limited liability company G (hereinafter referred to as "G"), and the defendant D and E are H and I of the Daep Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Company"), and the defendant F is an employee of the defendant Company.

B. G performed the work of manufacturing the vessel block under a subcontract from the Defendant Company, and the Defendant Company inspected the vessel block produced by G, and then took charge of the work of removing the vessel block using the Crain, etc.

C. Around 19:42 on December 24, 2010, Defendant F carried out the vessel block completed G using two straws. Upon the Defendants’ request, Defendant F carried out the removal of fing (weight 70 km), which was a steel pole that supported the vessel block by entering the vessel block composed of straws, with the Defendants’ request. During that process, one showC was damaged among four showC connecting the straws and the vessel block, one of the four showC connecting the straws, and fing shocked the Plaintiff’s head again.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). D.

In order to take out the vessel block, a shower must be connected to clers by sticking shower at 4 parts of the vessel block. At the time of the accident of this case, since the weight of the vessel block was about 160 tons, the Defendants used shower with a safety weight of at least 55 tons suitable for the weight, etc. of the vessel block, the Defendants used shower with a safety weight of at least 35 tons, which falls short of 4 out of 4, and as a result, the above 35 tons of the vessel block was damaged, and the accident of this case occurred.

In addition, Defendant D and E did not conduct a close inspection of Shacle's modified cracks, but did not implement it even though they prepared a safety work plan including safety measures to prevent the fall, fall, and electric intensity of the vessel block in advance and did not implement it even though they notified the workers.

E. The instant case.