beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiff A, KRW 529,477,669, KRW 9,000,000, and KRW 6,000,000 for the Plaintiff C.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff A is an employee of limited liability company G (hereinafter referred to as "G"), and the defendant D and E are H and I of the Daep Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Company"), and the defendant F is an employee of the defendant Company.
B. Plaintiff A worked as the head of the contact team in the vessel block processing work subcontracted by the Defendant Company, and when G and the Defendant Company’s subcontract produces vessel block, Plaintiff A and the Defendant Company had the Defendant Company take charge of the work of carrying out the vessel block using clers, etc. after examining it.
C. At around 19:42 on December 24, 2010, Defendant F carried out the vessel block completed in G in accordance with the above subcontract, using two stacks. During the process, Plaintiff F removed fins (weight 70km) from the steel block, which was the steel pole (weight 70km) supporting the vessel block at the Defendant’s demand, the vessel block was damaged, and the vessel block was fins with one fins with one fins with one fins with one fins connected the vessel block and the fins. Plaintiff A shocked head on the said fins.
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). D.
In order to carry out the above shipping operation, Shari was carried out with kicker at the height of four parts of the vessel block. Although the shower with the safety weight of at least 55 tons suitable for the weight, etc. of the vessel block at the time of the above operation was used, the shower with the safety weight of at least 35 tons was used at one out of four parts, and the accident of this case occurred as the shower with the safety weight of at least 35 tons was damaged.
In addition, Defendant D and E did not comply with the safety work plan, and did not conduct a close inspection of Shacle's transformation and rupture although they did not perform the close inspection.
E. In the instant accident, Plaintiff A suffered bodily injury, such as external wound, and so on.
F. Plaintiff B’s wife, Plaintiff C.