logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.23 2017고단1296
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On May 2014, the Defendant against the victim C by telephone at an infinite location, the Defendant would allow the victim C to enter the victim’s “Seoul Gangnam D department store E division via the Seoul Gangnam D department store head office E division.”

A false statement was made to the sales cost of KRW 15 million.

However, even if the Defendant received the above money, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to allow the victim to enter the D department store code.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above, and was transferred KRW 15 million from the victim to the victim, on May 22, 2014.

B. On May 2014, the Defendant against the victim F may bring the victim F, his mother, in Seoul Jung-gu G and 201, into the victim F, his mother, “The head office E division of the D department store in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam D department E division, thereby allowing the victim F to enter the victim F, who is his mother.

A false statement was made that “The cost of KRW 15 million and incidental expenses are changed.”

However, even if the Defendant received the above money, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to allow the victim to enter the D department store code.

The Defendant deceiving the victim as above, and was transferred from the victim to the victim on May 27, 2014, KRW 16.8 million on or around September 268, 2014, KRW 19.48 million on or around September 4, 2014 as the sales costs and incidental expenses.

2. The Defendant did not have obtained the consent or delegation of the seizure and mortgage contract regarding the real estate G and 201 real estate (hereinafter “the instant real estate”) in the name of his spouse, Jung-gu Seoul, Seoul, and H (hereinafter “the instant real estate”).

A. On December 16, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime of December 16, 2013, attached the principal real estate in the name of the wife (H), currently living, under the title, “A representative of the Dispute Resolution Council may not repay the price of the goods to K to K by using a computer within the office of the Dispute Resolution Council (I),” which is attached to the principal real estate in the name of the wife (H).

arrow