A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

B is an operator of "C", which is a scrap metal treatment company, and the defendant is the operator of "D", which is a scrap metal treatment company, and the defendant and B are known to the same industry while engaging in the same kind of industry.

On June 2017, the Defendant and B came to contact with the information that sold the waste cables in the E E located in the Seocho-do, the Defendant and B conspired to acquire the money from the victim G, which was known to B as a business relationship, under the pretext that B would purchase the waste cables.

On June 26, 2017, the Defendant and B, based on the above public offering, at the I office located in Ulsan-gun H located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, the Defendant and B, “I would like to purchase waste cables emitted from F with the Defendant, and would have obtained profits from 30-50% of the back-to-door 300 million won. From August 30, 2017 to August 30, 2017, at the loan of 200 million won, the Defendant and B would have paid interest of KRW 30 million with the interest of KRW 30 million, and at the time of selling scrap metal, there was a building with KRW 17 billion in the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan GovernmentJ, which has long been long engaged in the sale of scrap metal, and there is no apprehension that the Defendant would be KRW 17 billion monthly loss, and the Defendant paid KRW 2600,000,000 to the obligor on June 26, 2017.

However, in fact, B did not own a loan equivalent to 17 billion won in Gangnam-gu SeoulJ, and the Defendant did not own any personal debt of 650 million won and did not have any other property. The Defendant and B thought that the Defendant and B would use it for other business costs of the Defendant and B, such as the cost of redevelopment of the Seoul K apartment immediately after receiving money from the victim, so even if they received money from the victim, they did not have the intent and ability to pay the principal along with the interest as agreed upon by the victim.

The defendant and B, as above, deceiving the victim as above, L, which is the wife B around June 26, 2017 from the victim.