1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following order of payment shall be revoked.

1. The reasons why this Court shall state this part of the basic facts are as follows: “E” of the second 10th judgment of the court of first instance shall be “S”; “E” of the last 4th judgment shall be read as “A related Acts and subordinate statutes”; and “attached Form 1” of the fifth 1 and two 2 shall be the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The land in this case was not used for the business of installing the instant waste disposal facilities until November 30, 206. As of the date of closing the argument in this case, the portion of 1,560 square meters in the attached Form 1 among the land in this case, which connected each point of the attached Table 1, 2, 9, 13, 6, 7, 8, and 1, among the land in this case as of the date of closing the argument in this case, are used as a public notice, and the portion of 595 square meters in the ship connecting each point of 9,3, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 9 of the attached Form 1,560 square meters in sequence, which connects each point of 9,3, 10, 10, 10, 5, 12, 11, and 10 shall be used as a road and as a public notice, and as a gas filling station.

(2) The following facts are as follows: (a) the sum of 595 square meters in part and 1,644 square meters in part on the ship and 1,64 square meters in part on the ship; and (b) the sum of 1,560 square meters in part 1,560 square meters in part on the ship is the remainder of the land in this case; and (c) the ground for recognition / Each entry in subparagraphs 1 through 17, and 19 (including the number of serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply); (b) the result of the commission of measurement and appraisal to the Korea Land Information Corporation (T

2. Claim for damages due to loss of a redemptive right under Article 91 (2) of the Land Compensation Act.

A. The gist of the Plaintiffs’ assertion was that the Defendant did not use the entire land in the instant waste disposal facility installation business, which is the pertinent business, for the lapse of five years after the Defendant acquired the instant land, and the Plaintiff did not exercise the right of repurchase on the instant land pursuant to Article 91(2) of the Land Compensation Act.

However, the time period for exercising the right of repurchase is exceeded because the defendant failed to give notice to the networkO in accordance with Article 92(1) of the Land Compensation Act.