The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

The application for compensation order of this case shall be dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (1) The first police interrogation protocol (except for the cross-examination) against Defendant A, the first police interrogation protocol (except for the cross-examination), the first police interrogation protocol (except for the part) against the Defendant E, the first police interrogation protocol (except for the cross-examination), the first police protocol against the Defendant C, C, C, F, G, D, M, L, and B in violation of Article 244-3(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and (2) the second police interrogation protocol (except for the cross-examination) against the Defendant E, was conducted without the presence of the defense counsel, and thus, it is not admissible. (3) The second police interrogation protocol against the Defendant K did not allow the above Defendants to deny the above contents, and the second police interrogation protocol against the Defendant C, the second police interrogation protocol is not sufficient to admit the remainder of the facts charged (except for the cross-examination) evidence, and there is no evidence to acknowledge the witness evidence of each case, the second police interrogation protocol (except for the cross-examination) evidence of this case).