A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From September 27, 1983, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Bank of Korea under the name of the Defendant and entered into a family check contract from September 27, 1983.

On January 10, 2013, the Defendant issued one check number “E”, par value “5,00,000,” and one copy of the above bank bank bank check in the name of the Defendant, which was issued “FE”, “FE”, “FE”, and “FE, 15 April 2013,” within the office of D companies operated by the Defendant in Daegu-gu.

On April 15, 2013, the holder of the check presented the payment order to the bank.

However, from around that time to February 1, 2013, the Defendant issued a total of 45,00,000 won of household checks by the same method as shown in the attached Table 1, such as the fact that the Defendant did not receive deposits from around that time to around February 1, 2013, and each of the holders presented a payment proposal within the payment proposal period, but did not receive deposits due to the shortage of deposits.

From September 27, 1983, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Bank of Korea in the name of the Defendant from September 27, 1983 and traded household checks.

On January 20, 2013, the Defendant issued one copy of the above bank bank bank bank bank check in the name of the Defendant, which was named as “F,” “F,” “5,000,000,000,” and the date of issuance “F,” within the D company office operated by the Defendant in Daegu-gu Seoul-gu.

On May 10, 2013, the holder of the check presented the payment order to the bank on May 10, 2013.

However, the Defendant issued a total of KRW 20,000,000 as shown in the attached Table 2 on the same day, including that he did not receive as a disposition of suspension of transaction, and each holder presented a payment proposal within the period of payment, but did not receive due to each disposition of suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

"2013 Highest 3288"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.Each.