logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2015.04.03 2014가합104150
파면무효확인 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a corporation incorporated by combining B, Farmland Improvement Cooperatives, and Rural Development Corporation in order to contribute to the economic and social development of rural communities by implementing rural development projects, comprehensively managing agricultural infrastructure, and improving agricultural productivity on January 1, 2000.

B. On April 23, 1997, the Plaintiff was newly employed on April 23, 1997, and was promoted to Grade V on April 14, 2004, and the Defendant passed the three-class promotion examination conducted on November 27, 2010, and thereafter, the Defendant served at the Defendant’s Chungcheong Local Headquarters C Branch Office from January 21, 2013.

C. On January 16, 2014, the Commissioner of the Cheongnam-do Police Agency notified the Defendant of the investigation result that the Plaintiff passed the examination and answer in advance at the examination for promotion and provided money in return.

As a result of the investigation, 30 other than 32 employees of the defendant's 62 employees who were revealed to have committed the above misconduct related to the promotion examination was prosecuted, and the facts related to the promotion examination of such employees were reported to the press.

① On February 3, 2014, the Defendant’s president demanded a disciplinary resolution against the Plaintiff on the ground of the violation of Article 4 (Duty of Compliance) of the Rules of Employment to the High School Personnel Committee. ② On February 13, 2014, the High School Personnel Committee issued a duty order, such as statutes, articles of incorporation, and regulations (hereinafter “instant misconduct”). On February 13, 2014, the Plaintiff reported the above contents to the media, thereby seriously impairing the Defendant’s honor and dignity, impairing the public service culture, and disturbing the public service culture. ③ Accordingly, the Defendant removed the Plaintiff on February 14, 2014.

(hereinafter “instant removal disposition.” The Plaintiff, on March 2010, at a restaurant located D, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, to reduce the issues of promotion examination and answers in advance.

arrow