1. On February 14, 2014, the Defendant’s dismissal against the Plaintiff is confirmed to be null and void.

2. The plaintiff's remainder.

The defendant is a corporation established by integrating the existing Farmland Improvement Association, Farmland Improvement Association, and Agricultural Promotion Corporation in order to contribute to the economic and social development of rural communities by implementing rural development projects on January 1, 200, comprehensively managing agricultural infrastructure, and improving agricultural productivity.

On January 12, 1998, the Plaintiff was newly employed and worked as an engineer in the Jincheon Farmland Improvement Association, and the Defendant passed an internal recruitment examination conducted on November 24, 2007, and subsequently, was employed as Grade V on January 1, 2008 on the basis of the Defendant’s personnel order issued on December 14, 2007, and was promoted to Grade IV on January 14, 2010 by a personnel order issued on December 28, 2009, and served as the Defendant’s voice branch office in the Chungcheongbuk District Headquarters from around 2013.

On January 16, 2014, the Commissioner of the Cheongnam-do Police Agency notified the Defendant of the investigation result that the Plaintiff passed the examination and the answer in advance at the promotion examination and provided money in return.

As a result of the investigation, 30 other than 32 employees of the defendant's 62 employees who were revealed to have engaged in the above misconduct related to the promotion examination was prosecuted, and the facts related to the promotion examination of such employees were reported to the press.

On February 3, 2014, the president of the defendant requested the High School Personnel Committee to take disciplinary measures against the plaintiff on the ground of the violation of Article 4 (Duty of Compliance) of the Rules of Employment. On February 14, 2014, the High School Personnel Committee decided to take disciplinary measures against the plaintiff on the ground that the plaintiff committed the following misconduct (hereinafter “instant misconduct”). On February 14, 2014, the plaintiff issued a duty order such as statutes, articles of incorporation and regulations, and reported the above contents to the media, thereby seriously impairing the defendant’s honor and dignity, impairing the public service culture, and violated the duty of good faith required between the employer and his employee.

Accordingly, the defendant dismisss the plaintiff on the same day.