logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2019.02.20 2018고단250
경범죄처벌법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than four months and a fine not exceeding three hundred thousand won.

However, the above imprisonment for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 31, 2018, around 05:15, the Defendant was arrested in the act of assaulting B, who is the Defendant’s wife, at the Defendant’s residence located at the Seocho-si, from May 31, 2018, and was transferred to the office of the competent police station D district unit in the Seocho-si, Si around 05:25 on May 31, 2018.

1. Around 05:25 on May 31, 2018, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (hereinafter “Public Offices Revocation column”), the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance for about one hour, such as 05:25,00 a large interest to four police officers, E, etc. performing official duties with the influence of alcohol in the said D Zone, such as “packers who will remove the locks,” “packers who will prevent his family members from living at the beginning,” “packers who will not live at the beginning,” and “packers who desire and threaten, such as packers, and hack.”

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, led to very rough words and actions by public offices.

2. On May 31, 2018, the obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant injured the victim: (a) 11 met at the front seat of the police station patrol team office located in the said D District Office, and (b) the Defendant, along with the Defendant, stated that “the victim, who gets aboard the back seat, has a large number of ebbsom in our house, and the victim would die at the back seat of the ebbb.” on the ground that “the victim would die at the back of the ebb.” on the ground that the victim’s son was flick of the said victim at one time, and caused damage to the victim’s ebstin in need of treatment for about ten (10) days.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with police officers' performance of duties on the hand-over of flagrant offenders, and at the same time injured police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police preparation of E;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of CCTV images to D District CCTV);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of the disturbance of the head of a government office), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of the obstruction of performance of official duties), the Criminal Act.

arrow