A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 20, 2017, around 05:00, the Defendant received 112 reports from E, an employee of the said building, who is an employee of the singing singing room, who does not calculates the drinking value from the said building, and sent out to the site after having heard the above E’s statement, and the Defendant paid the drinking value to the Defendant after having heard the Defendant’s statement, and having the Defendant withdraw the measures to return home, and not having taken his statement, on the ground that the Defendant: (a) B, the Defendant: (b) on the ground that the Defendant: (c) on the ground that he did not enter the said G, the Defendant: (d) “Isk’s name was known to the manager; (b) did not state why he did not speak, and (c) did not state why he did not state; and (d) whether

A Man, the name of the Habs, "Habman," and the Habs of the Habs in large sounds, and the Habs of the Habs in which they prevented them, used the Habs of the Habs as the hand floor, and used the Habs of the He’s right eye one time as drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the site and photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommended punishment] There is no person [the person subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (six months to one year and six months) of Class 1 (Interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) [the decision of sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] and the conditions of sentencing indicated in the record, including the following circumstances and the defendant's age, occupation, sex, sex, family relationship, living environment, circumstances leading to the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence as ordered within the scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines.

- The defendant shows his attitude to recognize and reflect his mistake.

- The offense committed by the Defendant is very bad to the police officers in the course of performing official duties who expressed a bath and assault.

- The Defendant has a number of criminal records due to drinking or assault, and on October 7, 201.