1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance 3, 16, 4, and 11 is used as follows 2. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. Parts to be dried;

In addition, on December 9, 2015, the Plaintiff approved the budget bill for 2016, including “the special retirement allowance of 3.400 million won upon retirement of 2 executives within 16 years”. At the time, the shareholders of the Defendant Company attended the above board of directors and passed a resolution for approval, the Defendant Company’s intent to approve the payment of the Plaintiff’s special retirement allowance by the unanimous consent of all the shareholders in lieu of the resolution of the general meeting of shareholders. In addition, the Defendant Company’s shares are held at 75% of the incorporated association and 25% of D Company’s shares, respectively. On December 9, 2015, each of the above shareholders, who concurrently hold the board of directors of the Defendant Company, attended the board of directors of the Defendant Company’s company and passed a resolution for approval as to the budget bill as alleged by the Plaintiff. However, in light of the Plaintiff’s respective statements as set forth in subparagraph 5-1, 2, 3, and 3 through 8, and the purport of the Plaintiff’s general meeting of the Plaintiff’s retirement allowance as well.