logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.01 2014가합58004
이사회결의부존재내지무효확인
Text

1. All claims filed by the plaintiff (appointed party) and the designated parties are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiff (appointed party) and the plaintiff.

Reasons

In fact, the defendant's change in executive officers before the general meeting on January 7, 2012 stated that D on January 6, 2008, as the chairperson (representative director) of the defendant's corporate register, D on January 6, 2008, H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, P, and Q are appointed as each director.

Defendant D’s president resigned from office as president and director on October 23, 2009. The Defendant passed a resolution to appoint R as president at an extraordinary general meeting held on October 23, 2009. In Seoul Central District Court Decision 2010Gahap5590,7281 (Merger), the said court rendered a judgment to confirm that the above general meeting’s resolution was null and void on July 23, 2010. Although Defendant appealed for this, the Seoul High Court Decision was sentenced on July 14, 201, which became final and conclusive on August 6, 2011.

On November 2, 2011, R resigned from the defendant's president and director, and later, E was selected and appointed as the chairman acting for the president at the board of directors on December 2, 201.

On the other hand, directors M and Q resigned from office around 201.

On December 2, 2011, 11 directors (G, H, I, J, K, L, Selection F, N,O, C, and Q) other than five directors (D, R, Selection E, M, Q) of the defendant, resigned, proposed a convocation of the defendant's board of directors to elect the chairman acting, and issued a convocation of the board of directors on December 7, 201 to the directors.

On December 7, 2011, the Defendant held a board of directors on December 7, 201, at a T hotel located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant board of directors”) on December 11, 201, the Defendant held a board of directors (hereinafter “instant board of directors”). At the meeting of seven directors and passed a resolution to select C as an acting chairperson until the appointment of the new president (hereinafter “instant resolution”).

On October 27, 2011, the defendant elected the representative member of the sports management as the representative member of the sports management on October 27, 2011, the defendant elected U, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF, AH, AH, AI, and AJ.

The Chief of the Sports Administration.

arrow