1. The Defendant’s KRW 73,179,97 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from October 14, 2015 to May 3, 2018.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. At around 01:20 on October 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) placed the Plaintiff on the street following the building in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seoul, without any justifiable reason, at around 86, 14, 2015; (b) placed the time room for the Plaintiff to see whether the Plaintiff was able to drive away from the Plaintiff’s seat with the Plaintiff’s arms, and she continued to go up with the time room for the Plaintiff’s fighting. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s hand was 3-4 times on the back head and face side of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff got off 10 years after she added the Plaintiff’s body and was pushed up with the Plaintiff. The Defendant continued to sit on the bridge and was sentenced to 112 reports on the mobile phone so that the Plaintiff’s cell phone was destroyed and damaged by 15 months at the place where the Plaintiff’s cell phone was put up to the Defendant’s 12-day judgment, and the Defendant opened the Defendant’s cell phone to 14 months at the left.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 8, and 18, each entry and video (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts, the defendant is responsible for compensating the plaintiff for the damages caused to the plaintiff as the perpetrator of the crime of injury to the plaintiff and damage to property.

As to this, the defendant asserts to the effect that there was no intentional price for the plaintiff, and that the defendant was also different from the plaintiff, the responsibility should be limited.

However, the defendant's argument is contrary to the contents of the criminal judgment which became final and conclusive.