1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff is a carrier, and he sustained an injury by the defendant's hand on the cargo of the defendant since December 2016.

【Ground for recognition】 There is no dispute

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On December 16, 2016, the Plaintiff asserted that: (a) around 11:00 on December 16, 2016, the Plaintiff was charged with the freight transported to B farm as requested by the Defendant’s employee under Article 247-26 as Kim Jong-si Kimpo-si, Kim Jong-si; (b) in such a case, the Defendant’s employees and the head of the site, etc., bear the duty of care not to help the Plaintiff perform their duties, but did not fulfill that duty; (c) while the Plaintiff was driving the freight, he gets off the freight; and therefore, (d) the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 27,00,000 and the amount of KRW 3,00,000 and damages for delay as to each of the above money pursuant to Article 756 of the Civil Act.

B. The evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant’s employee suffered injury due to the Defendant’s breach of duty of care against the Plaintiff. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is without merit.