Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 2. 7. 02:09 경 청주시 흥덕구 C에 있는 청주 흥 덕경찰서 D 지구대에서, 폭행 사건과 관련하여 112 신고로 임의 동행한 상태에서 청주 흥 덕경찰서 E 소속 경찰관인 경사 F이 인적 사항 등을 확인하자 “ 짭새 들. 대단한 일 하네.

In doing so, the body of the slope F on board the ship is tightly pushed, and continue to be “I kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn.”

When intending to use violence while taking a bath, this son assaulted a slope F by walking the part of the slopeF once in the process, by walking the part of the slope F in the process.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written statement;

1. An investigation report (for voluntary accompanying), and a report of voluntary accompanying;

1. Investigative report (investigation into attachment of the table for 112 Report Processing), and the table for 112 Report Processing;

1. Investigation report (the person on board at the time of voluntary accompanying of the suspect);

12. The investigation of 112 Net Track Tracks

1. Investigation report (or relative investigation by a police officer who has obstructed the performance of official duties);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a CCTV image analysis and investigation that obstructs the performance of official duties), ctv-fags;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not only a large number of criminal records, but also a large number of criminal records, despite the fact that the defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime, the act of obstructing the performance of duties by assaulting a police officer on duty is considered to be disadvantageous to the defendant, and there is a reason to take account of the defendant's deposit of certain money with a police officer as a person who was the person who was the person who was the person who committed the instant crime, and there is some reason to regard the circumstance leading to the instant crime. The confession of the instant crime and reflects it.