A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2, 2018, at the convenience store located in Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s convenience store business for about 20 minutes, including: (a) the victim D (37 years old) who is an employee of the said convenience store; (b) the victim d (the father’s care center; d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d.

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2018. 4. 2. 05:00 경 위 장소에서 위와 같이 소란을 피우던 중, 112 신고를 받고 출동한 경찰 관인 순경 E로부터 귀가를 권유 받자, 위 E에게 욕설을 하며 오른손으로 그의 이마 부위를 1회 밀치고, 이어서 이를 제지하려는 경찰관인 경사 F에게 욕설을 하며 오른발로 그의 오른쪽 무릎 부위를 걷어찼다.

As a result, the defendant has prevented police officers from performing their legitimate duties on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Application of the written statement (D) statute;

1. Article 314 (1) ( point of interference with business) and Article 136 (1) ( point of interference with the performance of public duties) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of official duties);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (including the fact that the criminal defendant reflects his/her wrong and that he/she has agreed with the victim of the crime of interference with business);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act of the community service order;