1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 1. 4. 20:09경 안성시 일죽면 주천리에서 B 봉고프런티어 화물차를 운전하여 가던 중 교통사고가 발생하여 출동한 안성경찰서 C파출소 경장 D로부터 피고인에게 술냄새가 나고 얼굴이 홍조를 띠며 몸이 비틀거리는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할만한 상당한 이유가 있다는 이유로 약 30분간 3회에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주측정 할 것을 요구받았음에도 불구하고, 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 등 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of user of a drinking-free driver report and a drinking-free measuring instrument;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of penalty, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act regarding probation and an order to attend a probation and an order to attend a lecture may be deemed to have no room for the wife in that the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, despite the name of several times, led to the instant crime. However, considering the fact that the Defendant, in the confession of the crime, is divided and that it would not lead to the said crime, he/she was sentenced to probation and an order to attend a lecture,