beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The 4th to 15th of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be added to or after the 15th of the said parts as follows.
『다. 책임의 제한 다만 위 인정사실 및 앞서 든 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음의 사정들, 즉 망인이 야간에 빗길에서 운전하다가 우측 가드레일을 들이받는 등 선행 사고를 유발한 과실이 있고 이는 이 사건 사고의 발생 및 손해의 확대에 중대한 원인이 된 점, 피고 차량 운전자는 선행 사고를 보고 즉시 1차로로 진로를 변경하였으나 원고 차량이 1차로로 튕겨 회전하는 바람에 이 사건 사고가 발생하게 된 점, 그 밖에 이 사건 사고의 발생원인과 경위, 도로 상황 등에 비추어 피고의 책임을 20%로 제한한다.』 제1심판결의 별지 손해배상액 계산표를 당심 판결의 별지 손해배상액 계산표로 교체한다.
From 5th to 11th of the judgment of the first instance, the following shall apply:
[2) According to the above facts and evidence found as follows, the deceased worked for K stock company from October 4, 2013 to receive wages of KRW 45,795,032, the total amount of KRW 1,952,640, fixed extension work allowances of KRW 195,264, and KRW 200,000, total of KRW 2,547,900, total of KRW 200,000, total of KRW 2,547,90, and KRW 585,792, the bonus of July 390, KRW 585,528, KRW 585,792, KRW 412, KRW 412, KRW 412, KRW 195,264, KRW 195, KRW 200, KRW 200, and KRW 2,540, KRW 205, KRW 205, KRW 27,2985, etc., respectively.