Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 3, 2016, at around 19:40 on or around 19:40, the injured Defendant drinking food in front of the 7th floor waste bags of the building “C Sariba”, and sent the victim a bath with a large amount of hump that he would not get out of food from the victim D (52 aged) who is the above letter or operator. The victim would interfere with the events in the closed white room, and thus, the victim would be forced to get out of the building on the first floor.

was made.

On the other hand, the defendant continued to get off the elevator with the victim and get her mother and her mother at the expense of the first floor of the above building, and her head took the victim's left eye and her part at one time and her bath, and her head took the victim's part at one time, and her head took part in the part of the victim's part at one time, and her head took part in the part of the victim's part at one time, and her head took part in the part of the victim's part and the part of the victim's part in the part of the other part

2. The Defendant damaged the property by cutting the son’s hand from the victim’s cell phone calls at the above time and at the above place, and by making the cell phone break away from the floor of the place, thereby damaging the 199,000 won of the repair cost, which is owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of an injury diagnosis certificate and estimate;

1. Article 257 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant has the same criminal records and several criminal records as the defendant for the reason of sentencing of the provisional payment order; on the other hand, the defendant reflects the defendant and agrees smoothly with the victim; on the other hand, the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, family relationship, environment, circumstances and result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be comprehensively considered, and the punishment as set forth in the Disposition shall be determined as per Disposition