(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.05.12 2013가단248433

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.05.12 2013가단248433

매매대금반환

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B’s KRW 35,00,000 and for this, KRW 5% per annum from June 27, 2013 to February 11, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 30, 2013, the Plaintiff, a licensed real estate agent, purchased each of the purchase price of KRW 330,000,000, and the date of delivery of real estate as of July 17, 2013 (hereinafter the instant contract) with Defendant C, a broker of Defendant C, for multi-household housing located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul (hereinafter the instant housing) from Defendant B, as of May 30, 201, the Plaintiff confirmed that there were four rooms, one room, one room, one room, and two toilets, and two toilets. The Plaintiff did not enter into a contract under the present condition of facilities, the buyer, the building size of the building, 13.07 square meters, and the building size of the instant housing unit (hereinafter the “non-resident”). The Plaintiff did not enter into the agreement as a copy of the certificate of land collection and delivery, a copy of the agreement attached to each of the instant building (hereinafter the “instant building”).

B. The Plaintiff shall pay Defendant B the purchase price of KRW 280,000,000 in full, and the same year.

6. Around 26.26.

C. Defendant B, who was a new design of the instant multi-household housing, designed the instant non-01 housing units with E, the owner of the instant multi-household housing site and the owner of the building. However, for the construction report, the construction report was made by including the “medical room 2” as indicated in the attached drawing abutting on the instant housing unit No. 02 (hereinafter “the instant housing unit No. 02”) in order to avoid regulation under the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, and filed a report by dividing the “medical room 2” into non-02, and by dividing it into half of the nearest side of the instant housing No. 01 (area No. 18.5 square meters; hereinafter “the instant room”). After purchasing the instant housing unit No. 01 from E, the instant room was occupied as part of the instant non-housing No. 01.

The F referred to the bid No. 102 as the instant housing G is the Defendant around July 18, 2013.

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2016.01.22 2015나32916

-서울북부지방법원 2014.10.15 2013가단50333

-서울서부지방법원 2017.08.31 2016가단14099

-서울고등법원 2018.11.09 2018누42773

-인천지방법원부천지원 2014.10.17 2012가합8047