The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below against the defendant in light of the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the defendant has committed a crime that is against the victim while making a confession of all the crimes; (b) the degree of assault and injury inflicted by the defendant on the victims is relatively minor; (c) the defendant appears to have reached an contingent crime; and (d) the defendant has been punished by a fine on several occasions in favor of the defendant; (b) the defendant has been prosecuted on October 25, 2013 and was under trial on the same kind of crime as the crime in this case; (c) the defendant has been committed continuously without being aware of the fact that he was committed; (d) the defendant did not agree with the victims other than the victimO; (d) the defendant did not make any effort to recover from damage; and (e) the defendant was punished several times, but the defendant was not corrected, taking into account the fact that there is a need for edification from society, and all other circumstances that form the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.