The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) against the defendant in the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following: (a) the Defendant’s confession of all of the crimes; (b) the Defendant was against the victim while making a judgment; (c) the Defendant resulted in the occurrence of a crime due to economic difficulties; and (d) the Defendant was subject to criminal punishment several times, including the previous convictions sentenced to suspension of execution due to larceny and fraud; and (c) the Defendant’s lack of any relationship with his family; and (d) the need for edification by isolation from society is difficult because it is difficult to expect correction within society; (b) the commission of the crime in this case is not easy; (c) the commission of the crime in this case was not agreed upon with the victims; (d) the Defendant did not make any effort to recover from damage; and (e) there was no special change of circumstances after the judgment of the court below; and (e) there was no other condition attached to sentencing as indicated in the records. In full view of the following circumstances, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.