beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Power】 On March 27, 1997, the Defendant was sentenced to three years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the government’s branch of the Seoul District Court, and on October 7, 2004, sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the Seoul East District Court on November 29, 2012, sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime; on March 12, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the Seoul East District Court on March 12, 2015; and on November 4, 2016, the enforcement of the sentence was completed on February 23, 2019 after having been sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at the Goyang Branch Branch of the Seoul District Court on November 4
【Criminal Facts】
1. From August 17, 2019 to October 2, 2019, the Defendant: (a) opened a parking lot in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul; (b) opened a car that did not correct D Rason cars owned by the victim C; and (c) took one wall with cash 1,200,000 won owned by the victim; and (d) stolen property worth KRW 3,182,000 in total at the place of Seoul, etc. from around that time to around October 2, 2019, including the list of crimes (1) in attached Form 3,182,000, in total, eight times in the same way at the place of Seoul, including the list of crimes (1).
As a result, the defendant was sentenced to punishment twice or more due to larceny, etc., and again stolen the victims' property within three years after the completion or exemption of the execution.
2. On September 2, 2019, the Defendant violated the Fraud and Specialized Credit Financial Business Act: (a) around 12:14, 2019, when purchasing a stone from “G” bank operated by the Victim F in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant presented the victim as if there was a legitimate right to use the He’s national card in the name of H, which was stolen, as shown in the attached Table No. 1 (1) No. 3, and had the victim settle the account; (b) one half of the market price of the victim was received from the victim.