The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the judgment: The defendant shows an attitude against the defendant to recognize the crime of this case.

The stolen cash, etc. is relatively small amount, and the motor vehicle acquired by deception seems to have been returned to the victims.

The defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny and committed the crime of this case during the suspended sentence.

In light of the aforementioned favorable circumstances, the Defendant’s age and character environment, including unfavorable circumstances, relationship to victims, motive for and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., as well as various sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments and records of the instant case, and the sentencing guidelines, and the basic crimes of the scope of punishment recommended according to the sentencing guidelines (each special larceny) / [decision of types] No type 2 (general larceny) [the scope of recommended punishment] [the scope of punishment] concurrent crimes of the first type (crime of fraud) [the scope of punishment] between six months and one year and six months (basic area] [the determination of types] types of general fraud [the scope of punishment] [the scope of recommendation] [the scope of punishment recommended by the lower court pursuant to the standards for handling multiple offenses of imprisonment from six months to one year and six months (basic area]] [the scope of punishment recommended by the lower court is too unreasonable, taking account of the comprehensive consideration of the following factors: imprisonment with prison labor and six months to September 2.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.