1. The respective claims of the plaintiff's succeeding intervenor and the plaintiff's succeeding intervenor following the succession participation and participation in the trial of the political party.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the facts are as follows: (a) in addition to the alteration to “(including neighboring living facilities and multi-family houses; hereinafter the above D and E-land new buildings)” of the 3rd part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the claims of the plaintiff and the assignee

A. The court's reasoning for this part of the judgment on the ground of the plaintiff's claim is as follows: "Witness witness of the first instance court" was changed "2,00,000 won" from "2,00,000 won" from "2,000 won" from "2,00,000 won" from "2,00,000 in the second instance court's judgment," and "The defendant was aware that "the third floor be completed" part of the construction contract of this case was supplied with 2,026 square meters of forest J. 2,026 square meters and did not accept monetary liability on the above part." The plaintiff and C cannot be deemed to have agreed to pay remuneration from "the third floor be completed" of the construction contract of this case with "the third floor 2,00,000,000 won" from "the first instance court's 10,000,000 won and the first instance court's 15,000,000 won."