Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who uses the Internet music broadcasting "B" from "B", and the complainant C uses the "D" in the same broadcast.
A. On October 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 23:20 on or around October 5, 2017, at the site of the “Sag Gag”, the Defendant has no son.
20 Doz. Doz. 20 Doz. Doz.
" 라는 방송 제목으로 방송을 하면서 " 씨 발 놈 아, 개새끼야, 이 병신 아, 세 이에서 주워 먹은 거 하나 데리고 살면서 , 여자 꼬시고 주워 먹는 거밖에 할 줄 모른다, 청렴한 척 하면서 구린 짓은 다하면서, 너 걔랑 끝나면 다른 여자들 꼬셔서 데리고 살거잖아 "라고 말하여 불특정 다수인들이 들을 수 있는 인터넷 방송에서 공연히 고소인을 모욕하였다.
B. On October 6, 2017, at around 16:00, the Defendant sent a broadcast to the same title as that of “A” on the website of “A”, and publicly insulting the complainant, stating the same content as “A.”
(c)
At around 16:00 on October 7, 2017, the Defendant sent a broadcast to the same title as that of “A” at the port site as “A”, and publicly insulting the complainant, stating the same content as “A.”
(d)
On October 24, 2017, at around 10:30 on October 24, 2017, the Defendant publicly insulting the complainant by speaking the same content as that of the above A as “F” at the website of “A.”
2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon a victim’s complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the written application of the complainant filed in the records, the complainant can recognize the fact that the complainant revoked the complaint against the defendant on April 4, 2018, which is the date of the prosecution of this case. Thus, the indictment of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.