1. The Defendants are to the Plaintiff:

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) Joint and several 3,560,000 won and April 2, 2016.

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, the following facts can be acknowledged in the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 5.

The Plaintiff is the owner of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”).

B. The Defendants entered into a lease agreement between husband and wife, on March 30, 2006 and the Plaintiff on March 30, 2006 with a deposit of KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 1.2 million, and period of KRW 24 months, and thereafter operated a restaurant from the instant real estate.

Although the above lease contract has been implicitly renewed, the defendants did not pay rent and management expenses to the plaintiff from October 2008.

C. The rent and management expenses in arrears by the Defendants are KRW 43,560,000 until July 2016.

The Plaintiff, as a duplicate of the complaint of this case, notified the Defendants of the termination of the lease agreement due to the delay of rent.

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, since the instant lease agreement was terminated as the leased body of the Defendants, the Defendants are obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, and to pay the Plaintiff the rent calculated at the rate of KRW 33,560,000, which is calculated from August 1, 2016 to the delivery date of the instant real estate, and the rent calculated at the rate of KRW 1,200,000, which is calculated from August 1, 2016 to the delivery date of the instant real estate.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is justified and accepted.