1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the annex;

B. From April 1, 2017, the real estate listed in the Attachment.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as to Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, the plaintiff leased real estate owned by the defendant to the defendant on January 1, 2017 as KRW 20,000,000, KRW 1,500,000, and the period from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. The defendant is running a restaurant in this real estate, and the defendant is in arrears from April 1, 2017. Thus, the lease agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant between the plaintiff and the defendant was terminated as a monthly rent on November 21, 2017, where it is evident that the duplicate of the complaint in this case was served to the defendant.

Although the Defendant asserts to the effect that there was no cause attributable to the Plaintiff since the Plaintiff did not issue a tax invoice for rent and did not pay rent, it cannot be a ground for refusing to pay rent. Thus, the Defendant’s argument is without merit.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate indicated in the attached Form to the Plaintiff and pay the money calculated at the rate of KRW 1,500,000 per month from April 1, 2017 to the delivery date of the real estate due to the return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent or rent, and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition by the Plaintiff’s instant claim.