Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B indicated in the attached Form No. 9, 10, 11, 12, 9 of the attached Form No. 9, 10, 12, and 9 of the real estate indicated in
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. The facts of recognition are as follows: (a) on September 26, 2005, the Plaintiff constructed a new building on the land in the name of H (hereinafter “the instant building”) on the ground that H did not pay the Plaintiff rent the instant land to H and ordered the Plaintiff to transfer the said building to H and remove the building; (b) on September 26, 2005, the Plaintiff filed a civil suit (Korean Government District Court Decision 2014Ga30179) with the Plaintiff to win the entire portion of the Plaintiff on September 20, 2005, with the term of KRW 90,000 monthly rent, from September 26, 2005 to 36 months from September 26, 2005; and (c) H constructed a building on the land in the name of H (hereinafter “the instant building”); and (d) on the other hand, the part of the building in the instant case to be indicated and indicated by the lower court on each of the instant drawings (hereinafter “Defendant E”) on the building in the instant building to be indicated.
[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff and the defendant B, C, D, and G: The absence of dispute, the entries in Gap evidence 1 through 5, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the remaining defendants: The judgment of confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act)
B. According to the above findings of the determination, Defendant B, in the part on board, in the part on board, in the part on board, Defendant C, in the part on board, in the part on board, Defendant D, in the part on board, and in the part on board (e), Defendant E, and Defendant F and G, respectively, are obligated to withdraw from the part on board (f).
2. In determining the assertion of Defendant B, C, D, and G, the said Defendants concluded a lease agreement with H, the owner of the instant building, and the said building.