logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2015.05.13 2014가단223635
토지인도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) pine trees planted on the above real estate.

Reasons

On March 20, 2007, between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on March 20, 2007, two million won per annum for the rent of real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) on its own ownership, as advance payment each year.

3. Upon receipt of 21. 21. The period is until March 20, 2012. However, upon termination of the lease contract, the lease contract of this case was concluded to be leased by the Defendant to its original state (hereinafter “the lease contract of this case”), and thereafter, the lease contract of this case was implicitly renewed. The Defendant delayed payment of a total of KRW 4 million for the year 2012 and year 2013. The Plaintiff sent a certificate demanding the Defendant to pay the arrears of rent on April 12, 2013, and sent a certificate demanding the Defendant to notify the termination of the lease of the termination of the lease of this case on July 11, 2013. The above proof was delivered to the Defendant around that time, and thereafter, the Defendant paid the real estate of this case 2012 and the total number of KRW 400,000,000,000,000 among the parties to each of the instant real estate or the total number of KRW 140,000,00.

According to the above facts, the instant lease agreement was terminated by the Plaintiff’s notification of termination on the ground of the Defendant’s delinquency in rent. Thus, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff to its original state, collect 40 glue trees, 4 glue trees, and 600 glue tree, each of which is planted on the instant real estate, and to pay two million won from March 21, 2014 to March 20, 2015 due to the return of unjust enrichment.

As to this, the defendant is the defendant of the lease contract of this case.

arrow