logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.07.08 2018나2067603
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

The defendant of the claim shall be co-defendant of the first instance trial.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the revision of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows (the grounds for appeal by the defendant are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the defendant to this court, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in light of the evidence submitted by the defendant to the court of first instance, and there is no error as alleged in the ground for appeal by the defendant

(다만 제1심 공동피고 D, 제1심 선정자 E, F 부분은 제외). ▣ 제1심판결문 제4면 제7행의 ‘돈을 대여하면서’ 부분을 ‘5,000만 원을 대여하면서’로 고친다.

▣ 제1심판결문 제4면 제10, 11행 사이에 아래와 같은 내용을 추가한다.

A person shall be appointed.

F. The registration of the transfer of the first and second ownership in the instant case was cancelled as the Defendant (the status of the Defendant in the first instance court, but only the Defendant appealed, and the Defendant was referred to as “the Defendant” in this case) won the lawsuit against G in the civil procedure instituted against G. The registration of the establishment of each of the instant places was also cancelled.

As the registration of transfer of the first and second ownership of this case was cancelled, the Plaintiffs were not reimbursed the secured debt of each of the instant secured claims from G.

』 ▣ 제1심판결문 제8면 제6, 7행 사이에 아래와 같은 내용을 추가한다. 『 ⑥ 민사재판에 있어서 형사재판에서 인정된 사실에 구속을 받는 것은 아니라 하더라도 이미 유죄로 확정된 관련 형사사건의 판결에서 인정된 사실은 유력한 증거자료가 되므로 민사재판에서 제출된 다른 증거에 비추어 형사판결의 사실판단을 채용하기 어렵다고 인정되는 특별한 사정이 없는 한 이를 배척할 수 없다

Supreme Court Decision 88Meu16270 Decided September 12, 1989 and Supreme Court Decision 90Da11028 Decided January 29, 1991

arrow