Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 3,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are married couple, who jointly operate E in Western-gun D.

1. Defendant A

A. Around 10:00 on September 25, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the work at the F members and E boundary points, and at the point of the above E-building boundary located immediately adjacent thereto, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s installation work of the victim’s blocking by leaving five studs installed by the victim I who is the equipment operator in order to install a screen.

B. Around 10:30 on September 25, 2013, the Defendant’s interference with business and defamation occurred in the F medical clinic, and the victim H filed a false claim for medical expenses to the above F medical clinic, and subsequently, the victim J during the medical examination and treatment of the patient while the patient J did not have been subject to the suspension of business by claiming medical expenses by false means, and the patient J was under suspension of business by filing a false claim for medical expenses, and filed a false accusation against the insurance company affiliated with the internal medical clinic and filed a false complaint against the insurance company affiliated with the internal medical institution.” As such, the patient waiting to avoid disturbance for about 10 minutes return to the hospital.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the victim's medical services and damaged the victim's reputation by openly pointing out false facts.

C. On September 25, 2013, the Defendant’s defamation occurred in K Drat’s Republic of Korea, around 14:30 on September 25, 2013, damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by claiming that the victim H was not subject to the suspension of business, even though the victim H was not subject to the said Fratian’s medical expenses by falsely claiming medical expenses, and by claiming that “the Fratian had received a large amount of physical treatment from Fratians and received less insurance money by claiming that the Fratian had received a large amount of physical treatment, and the relevant Fratian was subject to the suspension of business,” the victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.

2. Defendant B: (a) around 13:00 on September 25, 2013, the victim H used medical expenses in the above E; and (b) the victim H used medical expenses.