The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In full view of the fact-finding that the defendant consistently denies the crime from the investigative agency, the victim's damage status and the statement about the details of the report is low and consistent in light of its contents, and the F's witness's statement is also less reliable in light of its contents, prior to the time when the defendant reported to the police, prior to the time when the defendant reported to the police, the time when the defendant reported to the police is unable to purchase golf loans in the light of the victim's report, the defendant's statement that is the police officer G, which is the police officer, denies the defendant's statement at the police, is inadmissible, and thus, it cannot be admissible as evidence. However, although the defendant's statement that is the police officer denies the defendant's statement at the police, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, it erred by misapprehending

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the fact that the Defendant inflicted bodily injury upon the victim’s head with golf loans is sufficiently recognized. Therefore, the lower court’s judgment convicting the Defendant of the instant facts charged is just and acceptable, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

subsection (b) of this section.

The above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

① The victim consistently makes a statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court below to the effect that “the Defendant was faced with the victim’s house and the victim was sealed, the Defendant prices the head of the victim once with golf loans, and the Defendant followed the body of the victim several times due to its appearance.” The witness F also in the investigative agency and the court of the court below that “the Defendant was pushed the victim in two arms.”