The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is the owner of CF Hadon Hadon.

No private motor vehicle, other than commercial motor vehicles, shall be provided or rented for transport with compensation.

Nevertheless, at around 00:44 on May 18, 2016, the Defendant operated an unspecified substitute driver with the above-mentioned van in the section from the Sungnam-si branch to the Dong branch in the same Gu and received KRW 2,000 per transport fee.

Accordingly, the defendant provided private cars for transportation with compensation.

2. The video CD images submitted by an unrecognified reporter as evidence to acknowledge the instant commercial transport, but there is no video recording to acknowledge the commercial transport (the statement and statement of the reporter, as shown in the facts charged, shall not be admitted as evidence, since they stolen the name of D). 3. As such, the facts charged in the instant case fall under a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the Defendant shall be acquitted pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment shall not be disclosed pursuant to the proviso of Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act, since it constitutes a case where the Defendant’s consent cannot be obtained.