logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고정584
상해
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the owner of multi-household housing in Seoul, China-gu, and the victim E (the 55-year-old) purchased three households among the above housing, and the defendant and the victim did not have any dispute as to who is responsible for the management expenses of the unsold household in a situation where all the entire households of the above housing have not been sold.

On December 16, 2013, at the entrance of the above multi-household house around 08:30 on December 16, 2013, the Defendant discovered that the owner is responsible for until the completion of the first sale, but on the other hand, the Defendant reversed the promise and found it as a pharmacy operated by the victim.

The Defendant expressed the victim’s “G pharmacy” operated by the victim in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, that “I want to see, at any time, I want to do this promise,” and assaulted the victim with the face of the victim, who was satisfing the victim, and who was satfing the victim’s bat, was satfing the victim’s bat, and was satfing the victim’s face.

2. Determination

A. The evidence presented by the Prosecutor alone is insufficient to readily conclude that the Defendant committed assaulting E, taking into account the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, even though there are statements in investigation agencies and courts of E, copies of medical records, diagnosis certificates, on-site photographs, and photographs of damaged parts of E, etc. as evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case.

E, on December 22, 2013, the investigative agency stated, “The Defendant, in the form of breath’s breath, was able to have the face of E in the form of drinking breath and hand breath in the form of breath’s hand.” However, on September 19, 2014, after the psychological life test was completed, the Defendant called to the inspector on September 19, 2014, and called “the Defendant’s face of drinking breath, such as a bat player,” and reads the bat.

arrow