logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.03.28 2017고단1398
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle in C in a manner that is in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Risk Driving).

On September 15, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol 0.131% during blood transfusions on September 21, 2017, and proceeded ahead of the E-distance D in the following mountain basin with the front of the E-distance away from the egrari basin.

In such cases, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as taking the front door and left door well, and accurately operating the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to perform the above duty of care in a state where the face is red and walked, and the walking condition is difficult to drive normally, such as a big distance, and neglected to perform the duty of the front-time watch, and was caused by negligence by the Defendant’s failure to perform the duty of the front-time watch, and received the front-hand part of the car driven by the Defendant, following the vehicle of the victim F (55 years old) who was standing in the signal signal waiting in front of the direction of the passage of the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim, by negligence in the above business, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks due to influence of drinking, and injury to the victim H (56 years old) who was on a sod-called sod-called sod-called sod-called “hurged vehicle” in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

2. Violation of traffic Acts on roads;

A. On the day specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant driven a C Spo-type car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.131% from the 5km section to the place where the accident described in paragraph 1 occurred at the center of the following city: (a) the Defendant driven the C Spo-type car in the state of under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.131% in blood.

B. The Defendant, after dividing about 20 minutes of the accident described in paragraph 1 with the victims involved in the accident, is the same again.

arrow