1. The defendant's notary public against the plaintiff was a vice-joint law office No. 1097, 201.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant Company is an insurance agency representing the conclusion of an insurance contract for several insurance companies, and the Plaintiff entered into and works for a commission contract with Defendant Company on September 2, 2011.

In December 27, 2011, a retired insurance solicitor is a retired insurance solicitor.

B. The Defendant Company pays a certain percentage of the premium as fees for insurance contracts concluded by an insurance solicitor under the pretext of solicitation, performance allowances, advance payment, etc. This is the form of advance payment made by an insurance company on the premise that the insurance contract is maintained, and thereafter the insurance contract becomes null and void, cancelled, etc., the obligation to refund the fee is imposed on the insurance solicitor. The Defendant Company demands guarantee insurance or personal guarantee, and a notarial deed in the form of money loan for consumption as a job document for the purpose of securing the claim.

C. The Plaintiff also agreed to the criteria for the payment and return of fees provided by the Defendant Company when entering into an appointment contract with the Defendant Company, and each of the delegation forms for the preparation of authentic deeds with the amount of debt KRW 20 million (hereinafter “the delegation form of this case”).

The main contents thereof are as shown in the attached Form.

In addition, on September 30, 2011, the Defendant Company prepared, on behalf of the Plaintiff, the No. 1097, a notarial deed of a monetary loan agreement on behalf of the Plaintiff under the letter of delegation of this case, No. 1097.

(hereinafter “instant notarial deed”). D.

Then, on December 30, 201, when the plaintiff retires from the defendant company, the plaintiff prepared and submitted a written confirmation with the same contents as the attached Form concerning the receipt of retirement fees and the liability for damages to the defendant company that could occur thereafter.

E. The Plaintiff, while being in office, had concluded an insurance contract for B, C and D, one of the principal and their children, and thereafter had the insurance contract with the Plaintiff and B.