logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.11.28 2016가단132304
청구이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiff shall execute the deed No. 1437, 2015, drafted on December 2, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is the representative of the branch D (hereinafter “instant branch”). On around 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a commission contract (hereinafter “instant commission contract”) with an insurance solicitor to perform duties incidental thereto, such as brokerage, maintenance, management, etc. of the conclusion of an insurance contract, and to receive fees according to an insurance contract (hereinafter “instant commission contract”), and signed a written pledge and written consent on commission contract, payment of fees, redemption, etc. (hereinafter “instant written consent”).

On the other hand, the Plaintiff worked at the instant branch on February 2016 and retired from employment to the said branch E around February 2016.

[Plaintiff’s assertion that there was no commission contract with the Defendant to work at the instant branch. However, according to Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 3, 3, 4, and 7 (including serial numbers), the Plaintiff’s commission contract was concluded with the said online trading company and the Defendant). (b) The said online trading company pays a certain percentage of the premium as commission fees for insurance contracts concluded through an insurance solicitor at each branch as to the insurance contract through an insurance solicitor, such as subscription, performance allowances, and advance payment. Under the premise that the insurance contract is maintained, if the insurance contract becomes null and void, cancelled, or terminated after the insurance contract becomes void, the fee shall be returned. (c) The Defendant agreed to prepare a notarial deed with the Plaintiff and other insurance solicitors in relation to the return of performance fees, but to secure the fulfillment of the above obligation to return, and the Plaintiff through the client Financial Services Commission agreed to pay the fee to the Plaintiff, the issuer, the issuer’s place of issue, the issuer, and the issuer’s note No. 2015, Dec. 2, 2015

arrow