1. Of the instant lawsuit, each of the claims against the Defendants for the collection of trees and for restoration to its original state, against Defendant C.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 6, 2013, the Plaintiffs completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to H 2218 square meters (hereinafter “Plaintiffs’ land”).

On the other hand, on April 24, 2015, Defendant C acquired a F 2036 square meters (hereinafter “F land”); Defendant D and E respectively, on April 24, 2015, a G 3554 square meters (hereinafter “G land”).

나. F 토지 중 별지 제1 도면 표시 o, ㅈ, ㅊ, ㅋ, ㅌ, ㅍ, ㅎ, ㄱ¹, ㄴ¹, ㄷ¹, ㄹ¹, ㅁ¹, ㅂ¹, ㅅ¹, ㅇ¹, ㅈ¹, ㅊ¹, ㅋ¹, ㅌ¹, o을 순차로 연결한 선내 (마)부분과 G 토지 중 같은 도면 표시 ㄹ, ㅁ, ㅂ, ㅅ, ㅍ¹, ㅎ¹, ㄱ², ㄴ², ㄹ을 순차적으로 연결한 선내 (라)부분 145㎡(이하 통틀어 ‘이 사건 통행로’라 한다)는 종래부터 원고들을 비롯한 인근 주민들이 차량 또는 도보로 출입, 왕래하던 통행로의 일부이다.

C. The Plaintiffs’ land may use I and J land (hereinafter “I”) in addition to the use of the instant road by way of contribution. The said land is a dry field between dry field and dry field, and the extent to which one adult can walk.

Defendant C, on May 9, 2015, was provided as the passage of the instant case by Pokele on the part of the F land, which was provided as the passage of the instant case, and the Plaintiffs were unable to use the passage of the instant case by installing iron pents between G and public land.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 7, Eul evidence Nos. 12 (including paper numbers) and images, and the result of the on-site verification by this court, the result of this court's commission of surveying and appraisal to the cerealistic branch of the Korea Land Information Corporation, and the result of fact inquiry, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Among the instant lawsuit, the part of the claim for the collection of trees and the restoration of the original state against the Defendants, the part of the claim for the collection of goods on the ground other than the air conditioners against Defendant C, and the part of the claim for indirect compulsory performance as to each of the above claims are lawful ex officio.