(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2017.10.24 2014가합1549

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2017.10.24 2014가합1549

약정금

Text

1. As to KRW 441,160,957 and its KRW 141,160,957 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall be from April 23, 2014 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff: (a) received support from the National Housing Fund each of KRW 20,00,000 per household (the first repayment date shall expire on February 2010); (b) completed the construction of the E apartment complex (the total number of household units 218, the compulsory repayment period of five years, and the general sale period after the termination of the mandatory lease period) around the end of December 2000; and (c) around May 13, 2009, the Plaintiff began to move into the Republic of Korea; (d) around May 13, 2009, 10 households among the above E apartment units (101,24, the total number of household units and 102,76, and 100,000,000,000,000,000 or less (hereinafter “instant sales contract”); and (e) made out the purchase price of the instant apartment unit (hereinafter “the instant apartment unit”) together with the Defendant sales contract, 60,5000,4000.

The main contents of the sales contract and the understanding of this case are as follows.

The parties to a housing contract - The plaintiff - the buyer - the buyer - the buyer - the buyer - the buyer - the total of 24 households such as the defendant 101 105 dong 101 - the total of 76 households such as 102 dong 101 - the house price of the 101 24 households: 1,560,000 won (the balance of contract amount of KRW 1,356,456,000, the balance of KRW 203,544,000): 102 76 households: 4,940,000 won (the contract amount of KRW 4,245,64,000, the balance of KRW 694,36,000,000) shall be paid in addition to the late payment charge if the contractor fails to pay the balance by the due date.

The arithmetic average price, including the National Housing Fund of each household that was sold in lots and the lease deposit, shall be the selling price of the apartment of this case - The buyer of this case - The buyer of this case - the buyer shall be the arithmetic average price.

B. Nos. 1 and 2 of the instant case, on the other hand, the Defendant purchased the instant apartment from the Plaintiff on May 13, 2009, and the Defendant purchased the instant apartment from the Plaintiff.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.17 2015가합515238

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.04 2014가합515118

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.04 2013고정3340

-전주지방법원 2016.06.22 2015가단29666

-서울고등법원 2015.01.15 2014나2008583