1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. The pertinent Plaintiff is WW’s wife, and the Defendant is WW’s model, as the Plaintiff’s model.

B. 1) The co-defendant B of the first instance trial on each of the lands of this case is deemed to be D (hereinafter “D”).

(2) Each of the above lands is “each of the lands before subdivision” and “each of the instant lands before subdivision”.

2) On January 17, 2003, the Plaintiff, the Defendant, H, and I owned their respective shares in each of the lands before subdivisions (i) land E is the Plaintiff 183/1,206 shares, the shares in Defendant 184/1,206 shares, H 384/1,206 shares, the shares in H 383/1,206 shares, the shares in I 383/1,206 shares, and (ii) F is the shares in Plaintiff 80/321 shares, the shares in Defendant 81/321 shares, H 80/321 shares, the shares in H 80/321 shares, the shares in I 80/321 shares, the shares in G land, and the shares in Defendant 10/33 shares.

3) On or around April 14, 2003, among each land before subdivision due to the division and land category change, ① land E was changed to E, J 367 square meters, K 760 square meters, K 72 square meters, L road; ② F land was changed to F large 195 square meters, M road 23 square meters, N 26 square meters, O road 9 square meters, P ditch 68 square meters, ③ G land was changed to G land to Q 198 square meters, Q 132 square meters, and R road 3 square meters, respectively. 4), the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and H and I were recorded in the separate sheet (excluding the shares indicated; hereinafter the same shall apply) in each land indicated in paragraph (3) of the attached Table 1.

(5) Each land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 is divided into each land listed in the separate sheet No. 2 (excluding the indication of shares; hereinafter “each land of this case”) and each land listed in the separate sheet No. 2 (excluding the indication of shares; hereinafter “each land of this case”) on September 20, 2007, as the Plaintiff and the Defendant owned 1/2 shares, J 760 square meters, and H and I owned 1/2 shares, respectively, and the co-owned property partition on July 5, 2003.

C. On March 31, 2003, the new building of this case was newly constructed on each of the land of this case as listed in the separate sheet No. 3 (excluding share indication; hereinafter “instant building”) and the Plaintiff and the Defendant respectively on May 22, 2003.