1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,00,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from April 27, 2006 to February 13, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party is that the Plaintiff is a second-born male, and the Plaintiff is a person who received the Gap upper-board medication at the Hanyang University Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. (1) On February 27, 2006, the Plaintiff was under comprehensive medical examination conducted at the Defendant Hospital. The Plaintiff measured the Arymmon’s Ammon with 5.45mU/l (normal value: 0.27mU/l-2.4mU/l) at the Ammon test, and showed symptoms under the Ammon’s function.

(2) As a result, on March 24, 2006, the Defendant hospital conducted a first-wave test to the Plaintiff. As a result, on the Plaintiff’s result, it was diagnosed that the Plaintiff’s centered on the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the Plaintiff’s upper part of the Plaintiff’s upper part of the Plaintiff’s upper part of the company: (a) the surrounding part shows a erode; (b) 2 x 1 x 1 cm in size, including a large number of tin in the inside part; and (c) the difference in size of 2 x 1 cm in the upper part of the company’s upper part of the company’s upper part of the company’s upper part of the Plaintiff’s upper part of the company, was observed as a result of

On March 27, 2006, the Defendant hospital inspected A merchant cans to the Plaintiff on March 27, 2006, and as a result, the Plaintiff’s Gap merchant boat was diagnosed as non-functional Gap merchant boat.

(3) On March 30, 2006, the Defendant hospital conducted a sacrific test (FNAC) on the left-hand upper line of the Plaintiff’s hospital. As a result, the Defendant hospital was diagnosed to be suspected of malicious cancer as a result of the examination on the left-hand upper sampling.

(4) On April 7, 2006, the Defendant hospital conducted a light CT shooting to the Plaintiff, and diagnosed that “A upper-tier malone, which was referred to as the result of the early high-frequency test, is not confirmed, and three agreements are confirmed between the middle and lower side of the upper side of the upper-tier mar, and the left side of the upper side of the upper-tier mar, and that there is no obvious marbrance in both items, and that there is no obvious marbrance in both items.”

(5) Around April 10, 2006, the Defendant Hospital’s hospital considered the aforementioned results of the examination as a whole and led to the Plaintiff’s sexual intercourse.