logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.04.22 2014고단606
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On February 13, 2003, around 23:07, the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, was in violation of the restriction on the operation of the vehicle by the road management authority by loading and operating the freight exceeding 1.1 ton of 11.1 ton of 2, although he was unable to operate the freight in excess of 10 ton of 10 ton of 11.1 ton of 2, on the road at the Seoul Osan Station at the 381km branch of the Gyeong Highway at the 381km branch.

2. As to Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Mar. 5, 1995; Act No. 12013, Nov. 28, 2013; Act No. 12214, Dec. 14, 2015; Act No. 12068, Mar. 16, 2014>

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow