logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.04.22 2014고단458
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On January 3, 2003, the summary of the facts charged is that C, an employee of the Defendant, was in violation of the restriction on the operation of vehicles by the road management authority, by operating D trucks loaded with freight exceeding 11.1 ton of 10 tons in front of each transmission business office at the Korea Highway Corporation located at a point of 36.2 km away from the west Highway, which is located at a point of 36.2 km away from the west Highway.

2. As to Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Mar. 5, 1995; Act No. 12013, Nov. 28, 2013; Act No. 12214, Dec. 14, 2015; Act No. 12068, Mar. 16, 2014>

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow