logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.12.15 2016가단145045
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant Incorporated Foundation C is a legal entity that operates a hospital located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and Defendant B is a person who works for the Defendant Hospital as a doctor, and the Plaintiff is a person who has been subject to the pathic pathic pathic pathic and conical rathic rathing twice from Defendant B.

B. The Plaintiff’s past history and the developments leading up to the Defendant Hospital (i) from around 2013 to 2013, while the Plaintiff taken RI photographs at the nearby hospital and provided preservation treatment, such as negopathic surgery, due to serious pain on August 31, 2016, the Plaintiff was in the E hospital and was recommended to take an operational treatment from the medical personnel of the said hospital.

B. From September 1, 2016 to September 10, 2016, the Plaintiff was hospitalized at the Seocheon University Hospital of Macheon-do, and was treated as the second negotition to alleviate pain, but the hospital received the second negotition to undergo the surgery. However, on September 28, 2016, the Plaintiff provided the Defendant hospital with the purpose of performing the surgery.

C. (i) At the time of the Plaintiff’s introduction into Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff was under the condition that there was a symptoms of lowering the spawn calendar of the right bridge, the symptoms of the spawn spawn, the right side spawn, and the spawn spawn spawn spawn 5 in the face of a serious escape from the 4-5 patnive signboard.

B on September 29, 2015, Defendant B performed an crypary cryp agents and a conical signboard cutting method with respect to the Plaintiff on a general anesthesia.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant primary surgery”). After the surgery, the Plaintiff complained of the symptoms of her pain and right bridge her to her, but Defendant B decided that the surgery was successfully implemented and there was no special opinion, such as a merger certificate, and discharged the Plaintiff on October 4, 2016.

On October 5, 2016, the day following the discharge, the Plaintiff re-hospitalizes the G Hospital located in Bupyeong-si on October 5, 2016, and shows a pain and low hh.

arrow