logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.08.11 2019가단537328
손해배상(의)
Text

The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. A. Around August 2018, the Plaintiff experienced a pain of the left-hand side, and around October 2018, the Plaintiff taken a RI shooting at the F Hospital located in the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Eae Hospital operated by the Defendant Medical Corporation B (hereinafter “Defendant Foundation”) due to the symptoms such as the pain and the sloping of the walking bridge, etc., and was diagnosed by the Defendant C, who had the intention to belong to the above hospital, that there was a protruding escape certificate in the part 4-5 of the Y. The Plaintiff had the past ability to perform an operation for the same symptoms for more than 10 years as at the time of the examination.

B. On January 29, 2019, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in F Hospital and was subject to an inspection for scambling scambling, and the same year.

1. On January 30, 30, Defendant C received a new landscape pressure surgery (hereinafter “the instant surgery”). The medical record book of the F Hospital was written on January 17, 2019, along with the following: “The medical record book of the F Hospital explained to patients and their protectors that only the new landscape pressure should be implemented because removal, despite the fact-finding verification due to the spread of the current disc, may cause the ethic damage.”

C. After the instant surgery, the Plaintiff was discharged from the F Hospital on February 11, 2019, and the same year.

25. 25. Re-entering to the above hospital;

25. 25. The internal police officer was scheduled from the time of discharge.

The Defendant C’s prescription for the neutic treatment and the neutic control. The F Hospital’s medical records on January 31, 2019 indicate that “the neutic treatment was fluored, the stability was explained, and the amount was increased and preserved.” The patient’s disease column for the discharge summary of the discharge summary is indicated as “NO-proms.”

However, on April 3, 2019, when the plaintiff sits on or around April 3, 2019, he/she had a serious pain on the left side, and this year.

4.5. In other words, the Plaintiff was enrolled in the F Hospital and was treated by Defendant D, a doctor affiliated with the foregoing hospital. At that time, the Plaintiff was enrolled in Gwangju.

arrow